🔗 Share this article

Authorities have called it as one of the largest scams of its type in the UK.

A total of 14 people have been convicted for their involvement in a £28m plot to defraud over 3,500 vacation property investors.

The targets were desperate to get out of age-old timeshare contracts and went looking for support.

Most were in the age range of 60 and 80. In excess of 500 of them lost in excess of £10,000, and a single victim transferred in excess of £80,000.

Those affected were exposed to high-pressure sales meetings lasting up to six hours. They were left out of pocket, possessing valueless fake "rewards" and continued to be trapped in expensive vacation property deals they often use.

The Company Central to the Fraud

The firm at the heart of the scheme was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They accepted people's money to support the proprietors' luxurious way of life of exclusive education, high-end properties and private jets.

The individual at the top of the firm, the main defendant, was given a seven-and-half year prison term in January for conspiracy to defraud.

Recently, his wife another individual was among the last group to hear their sentences.

She received a two-year long suspended jail sentence at the judicial venue after confessing to financial crime.

This has been a long time coming and marks a major victory for the victims who came forward, the law enforcement and legal representatives.

How the Inquiry Was Initiated

I first heard about SMT emerged during the that particular year. The position was in the reporting team of a broadcasting service, producing current affairs shows.

A friend noted that his mum had inherited the ownership of a holiday property in Spain and, after decades of vacations, had started seeking to get out of the contract.

It should be noted how common timeshares had evolved with UK travelers in the eighties and nineties.

Vacation properties enabled families to occupy the same accommodation each season, or exchange their weeks with fellow investors who had properties in different locations. About 600,000 holiday enthusiasts accepted that option.

The early surge was linked to a numerous stories about rip-off merchants deceptively promoting properties. They appeared frequently on consumer TV programmes.

The common vacation property deal locked buyers for long periods.

By 2016, those holders who had used their regular accommodation in the sun for a long time were advancing in years, and many were looking to say farewell to their holiday properties.

Several had health issues and couldn't get to their units. Others just thought they'd got all they wanted from them. And a portion had died, in many cases bequeathing their heirs to take over the deals - plus their yearly fees and upkeep costs.

The Investigation Unfolds

This was the situation the friend's mum had found herself. She looked online for solutions and found SMT, a enterprise whose online presence claimed to release her from her agreement.

But, having made a payment and arranged an appointment with them, her loved ones smelled a rat.

Further research revealed hundreds of people saying they had handed over cash and got nothing in return. Indeed, they had lost money. A lot of it.

The reporting group commenced probing what was occurring. It quickly became clear that there were dubious individuals active in the timeshare resale sector.

A legal professional had numerous client reports waiting to sue the organization.

Reporters contacted people who had engaged the company and they each reported similar experiences. They believed the firm would buy their property away from them but when they went to a consultation (for which they submitted funds initially) they were told there was no market for their property.

Instead, they were encouraged - in fact pressured - to invest additional funds investing in "the firm's incentive scheme", linked to the organization's holding firm, the overarching entity.

The nature of these rewards was not exactly clear. They appeared to be a form of credit, offering cheaper vacations and benefits and retail offers.

And they were apparently "tradable" with additional holders, some time down the line.

Paying cash at the time would result in an long-term benefit that would pay for the firm's costs and result in the property owner with a gain, released finally from their burdensome agreement.

Too good to be true? Indeed, it was.

A 'Bait-and-Switch Tactic'

If these accounts were accurate, this was a massive scam.

It's what is called a "bait-and-switch."

A business - in this case SMT - "baits" the client by marketing a particular product only to then state it cannot be provided, directing the client towards an alternative, lesser option.

That's illegal. Possessing all the testimony we had gathered, we presented the rationale to secretly film one of the company's meetings.

Such an operation demands dedication, work, and compelling reasons for why this is the sole method to obtain the data needed to confirm deceptive practices.

With approval secured, our small team arranged a meeting with one of the company's representatives in the location.

Posing as a potential client aiming to assist his parent released from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement